Federal Judge Transfers Lawsuit Challenging Credit Card Late Fees Rule

Credit Card Late Fees Rule: Federal Judge Transfers Lawsuit | Enterprise Wired

Share Post:

LinkedIn
Twitter
Facebook
Reddit

Source- The Washington Post

A federal judge in Texas, known for hosting conservative challenges to Biden administration policies, has transferred a lawsuit contesting a rule restricting credit card late fees to a court in Washington, D.C. Here’s a breakdown of the latest developments:

Venue Transfer Decision

U.S. District Judge Mark Pittman, appointed by former President Donald Trump, made the decision to move the lawsuit after considering various factors. While half of the suing business groups are based in Washington, D.C., the majority of their legal representatives and the U.S. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB), which crafted the disputed rule, are also located there. The CFPB had requested the transfer, noting that no card issuer subject to the rule is headquartered in Fort Worth, Texas.

Dispute Over Venue

The U.S. Chamber of Commerce, along with five other groups, argued against the transfer, contending that affected cardholders reside in Fort Worth. However, Judge Pittman rejected this argument, emphasizing the importance of filing lawsuits where the underlying events occurred rather than based on plaintiffs’ preferences.

Biden Announces New Rule Capping Credit Card Late Fees at $8 in Move Against Junk Fees

Rule Under Scrutiny

The lawsuit challenges a rule aimed at curbing what the CFPB deems “excessive” fees charged by credit card issuers for late payments. The rule, set to take effect in May, limits late fees to $8 for issuers with over 1 million open accounts, unless higher fees are justified to cover costs. Previously, issuers could charge up to $30 or $41 for subsequent late payments.

Context and Future Proceedings

Judge Pittman’s decision comes amid concerns over “judge shopping” and the increasing volume of conservative litigation in the Fort Worth courthouse against Biden administration policies. While the lawsuit proceeds, the groups have sought to expedite the case, citing the need to notify consumers about potential changes ahead of the rule’s implementation. The 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals is expected to review Pittman’s decision not to expedite the case.

The lawsuit underscores ongoing tensions surrounding financial regulations and litigation strategies in the current political landscape. As legal battles continue to unfold, stakeholders await further developments regarding the fate of the contested credit card late fees rule.

Curious to learn more? Explore our articles on Enterprise Wired

Subscribe

RELATED ARTICLES

Resilient U.S. Shopper: Walmart's Positive Forecast Signals Economic StrengthSource-Reuters

Resilient U.S. Shopper: Walmart's Positive Forecast Signals Economic StrengthSource-Reuters

Source – Reuters Walmart Raises Full-Year Outlook on Strong First Quarter Performance Walmart, a leading retail giant and a bellwether…
Chinese Stocks Surge on Housing Solution Speculation

Chinese Stocks Surge on Housing Solution Speculation

Source – Reuters Hong Kong’s Hang Seng Index Hits New High Amid Optimism In a notable surge, Chinese stocks experienced…
Aurora Borealis: Anticipated Sky Show

Aurora Borealis: Anticipated Sky Show

Sky enthusiasts across a significant portion of the United States are eagerly awaiting a celestial spectacle this weekend as heightened…
TikTok Takes Action Against AI-Generated Content

TikTok Takes Action Against AI-Generated Content

Source – Tech Xplore TikTok is set to introduce a new feature that will flag users who upload content generated…