Key Points:
- Nine‑year board term limits set; leaders exit in 2026
- Founders criticize governance shift, citing weaker independence
- Magnum umbrella drives standardized governance across brands
Ben & Jerry’s has revised the governance rules that shape how its independent board operates. The changes will lead to the departure of the current board chair and two long-serving directors once their terms conclude. The company said the update is designed to strengthen governance standards while protecting the brand’s long-standing social mission.
The ice cream maker now operates under The Magnum Ice Cream Company, a publicly listed business formed after Unilever spun off its global ice cream division earlier this month. The governance update applies specifically to Ben & Jerry’s independent board, which has historically played a central role in overseeing the brand’s values and direction.
New Term Limits Reshape Board Composition
Under the revised rules, directors serving on Ben & Jerry’s independent board will be subject to a maximum term of nine years. This change introduces a formal limit where none previously existed, creating a defined cycle of board renewal.
As a result, board chair Anuradha Mittal, along with directors Daryn Dodson and Jennifer Henderson, will step down when their current terms expire in 2026. The three members will not be eligible to seek reelection under the updated framework.
The company described the move as a step toward maintaining institutional integrity while ensuring fresh leadership perspectives over time. Leadership teams across consumer brands often use term limits to balance continuity with renewal, especially in businesses where brand identity and governance are closely linked.
In a public statement, Ben and Jerry’s chief executive Jochanan Senf said the changes are intended to support long-term impact and help the company continue driving its mission in a structured and sustainable way.
Leadership Tensions and Strategic Alignment
The governance update follows a period of internal tension related to board independence and oversight. Ben & Jerry’s has long operated with a distinct governance model that sets it apart from many consumer goods brands, even after its acquisition by Unilever in 2000.
Co-founder Ben Cohen has publicly criticised the changes, arguing they weaken the authority of the independent board. Jerry Greenfield, the other co-founder, stepped away from the company earlier this year. His departure was linked to concerns about governance and decision-making autonomy.
From a business perspective, these developments highlight the challenges that arise when legacy governance models meet modern corporate structures. Entrepreneurs and business owners often face similar decisions when scaling a mission-driven brand within a larger corporate framework.
Position Within The Magnum Ice Cream Company
Ben and Jerry’s is now one of several brands operating under the Magnum Ice Cream Company umbrella. The new entity has begun reviewing governance processes across its portfolio, including its relationship with the Ben and Jerry’s Foundation.
Recent discussions between the company and the foundation have focused on aligning oversight practices and addressing governance gaps identified through internal reviews. These efforts point to a broader push toward standardised leadership structures across the newly formed business.
For business leaders, the situation underscores the importance of clearly defined governance rules during ownership transitions. Board composition, term limits, and decision authority can shape not only leadership stability but also brand trust and long-term growth.
As Ben & Jerry’s prepares for upcoming board transitions, attention will remain on how the brand balances renewal with continuity. The outcome may offer lessons for founders and executives managing governance in values-led consumer businesses.
Visit Enterprise Wired for the most recent information.
